The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

OTS vs. the Bar: Must Attorneys Advise Directors that the Directors Owe a Duty to the Depository Fund?

Show full item record

Preview:
Title: OTS vs. the Bar: Must Attorneys Advise Directors that the Directors Owe a Duty to the Depository Fund?
Author: Fortney, Susan Saab
Abstract: This article explores the liability of attorneys representing depository institutions. Part I of this article introduces the controversy over the proper role of bank counsel following the bank and thrift crisis. Part II discusses the first Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) actions against attorneys. Part III considers the emerging theory of liability based on counsel’s duty to advise directors on their duties to depositors and the depository fund. In Part IV, a comparison of the experience of the securities bar to that of the banking bar demonstrates how the government’s enforcement activity has already changed attorney’s perceptions of their role and their approach to law practice. Part V concludes by considering questions related to the proper role of counsel.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10601/128
Related Resources: Click to follow Hein Online link Click to follow Westlaw link Click to follow SSRN link
Date: 1993

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
fortney11.pdf 847.7Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account