DSpace Repository

Law and Border: The Seven-Hundred-Mile-Fence Proposal and the Rule of Law

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Graham, Ann
dc.date.accessioned 2011-03-29T18:09:48Z
dc.date.available 2011-03-29T18:09:48Z
dc.date.issued 2008
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/1300
dc.description.abstract This article proposes that the current immigration policy does not work and should be replaced with a universally enforceable immigration policy that can be successfully implemented. Because of limited resources, the new immigration policy must balance the following issues: the rule of law, human rights, national security, the economy’s dependence on cheap migrant labor, the costs and benefits of Mexican migrant workers, and the meaning of being an American. The author recommends decoupling national security and immigration policies, reducing spending and focus on militarization of the border, establishing a path for legalization of undocumented workers, and resuming bilateral talks with Mexico. The article discusses the proposed fence along the United States-Mexico border. The author explains this fence does not address the immigration concerns with the Canadian border, sea borders, or international airports. Next, the author explains how current immigration policy does not follow the rule of law. The author discusses the trade-offs we face in the implementation of a sound immigration policy. The author discusses human rights concerns arising from the current immigration policy. The author provides a history of immigration reform from the 1800s to the present day. The author concludes with recommendations for a better immigration policy.
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Illegal immigration en_US
dc.subject Immigration law en_US
dc.subject Border relations en_US
dc.title Law and Border: The Seven-Hundred-Mile-Fence Proposal and the Rule of Law en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record