DSpace Repository

Implied Warranties in Leases: The Need for Change

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Skillern, Frank F.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-03-11T17:45:46Z
dc.date.available 2010-03-11T17:45:46Z
dc.date.issued 1967
dc.identifier.citation 44 Denv. L.J. 387 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/135
dc.description.abstract “Caveat emptor” as it is applied to leases under which the lessee may use the demised premises for an express purpose is the focal point of this article. The rule denies the lessee relief, either as a defense or as a cause of action, for additional costs of repair or construction if the premises are structurally unfit for the expressed purpose or if changes must be made in the premises to conform to local codes relating to that purpose. Mr. Skillern discusses the development of the rule in these Situations, the limited remedies which are available to a lessee, and the inadequacies of these remedies in modern leasing transactions. He urges that changes in the nature of leasing transactions necessitate that courts or legislatures consider implying warranties of fitness for a particular purpose and of conformity to building codes in such leases. Mr. Skillern concludes by analyzing the nature of the proposed warranties, the prerequisites for their implication, and the new remedies which would be available if they were breached. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Denver Law Journal
dc.relation.uri http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/denlr44&collection=journals&id=399&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.subject Caveat emptor en_US
dc.subject Implied warranties en_US
dc.title Implied Warranties in Leases: The Need for Change en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record