The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

The Effect of Plaintiff's Conduct in Strict Products Liability in Texas: A Time for Reevaluation

Show full item record

Preview:
Title: The Effect of Plaintiff's Conduct in Strict Products Liability in Texas: A Time for Reevaluation
Author: Edgar, J. Hadley
Abstract: This article urges the Texas judiciary to reexamine and modify the existing law in the area of strict products liability. In Henderson v. Ford Motor Company, the Texas Supreme Court held that the aspect of plaintiff’s conduct known as voluntary assumption of risk is a complete bar to recovery and the facet known as contributory negligence is no defense at all in strict product liability cases. Professor Edgar points out that the leitmotif of the law of unintentional torts is to reduce accidents, thereby decreasing both physical and economic waste. Edgar argues that the best way to accomplish this goal is to abandon the “all or nothing” approach of Henderson, and permit the jury to consider the negligence of the manufacturer, producer, or designer, along with the contributory negligence of the plaintiff on the basis of a pure comparative fault system. Edgar concludes by noting that the judiciary, rather than the legislature, can best provide the appropriate modifications to the law of strict products liability.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10601/1568
Related Resources: Click to follow Hein Online link
Date: 1980

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
43TexBJ.pdf 1.332Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account