The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

Constitution in Conflict: The Doctrine of Independent State Grounds and the Voter Initiative in California

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van Cleave, Rachel A.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-03-12T19:47:02Z
dc.date.available 2010-03-12T19:47:02Z
dc.date.issued 1993
dc.identifier.citation 21 Hastings Const. L.Q. 95 (1993) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/171
dc.description.abstract In 1990, California voters passed Proposition 115, the "Crime Victims Justice Reform Act." Proposition 115 added three sections to article I of the California Constitution and attempted to amend section 2410 of the same article. These sections of Proposition 115, as well as sections of Proposition 8 (the "Victims' Bill of Rights"), altered California's criminal justice system. Proposition 8 set forth the constitutional rights of crime victims and Proposition 115 set forth those of the people of the State of California. These constitutional amendments create clear conflicts between the rights of criminal defendants and the rights of both crime victims and other California citizens. This Article addresses the process used to achieve the results of the propositions. Part I discusses the nature of the rights found in California's Declaration of Rights, and the need to maintain their stability. It also discusses the problems inherent in forcing the interpretation of California rights to follow federal interpretations. Part II traces the development of the independent state grounds doctrine in the United States, and specifically, in California. Part III explains the history and procedure of the voter initiative in California. Part IV analyzes how Propositions 8 and 115 have limited the ability of the California judiciary to give independent meaning to California's Declaration of Rights. Part V concludes that a super-majority vote for changes to the Declaration of Rights would best achieve balance between the right of the voters to alter the Declaration of Rights and the right to an independent state constitution. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.relation.uri http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hascq21&collection=journals&id=113&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.relation.uri http://web2.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?fn=_top&rs=WLW6.09&rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&mt=LawSchool&vr=2.0&sv=Split&cite=21+Hastings+Const.+L.Q.+95+
dc.subject crime victim's rights en_US
dc.title Constitution in Conflict: The Doctrine of Independent State Grounds and the Voter Initiative in California en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
Van Cleave 21 Hastings.pdf 2.312Mb PDF View/Open Van Cleave 21 Hastings

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account