The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

Notes on Official Immunity in ATS Litigation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Casto, William R.
dc.date.accessioned 2012-07-17T16:45:40Z
dc.date.available 2012-07-17T16:45:40Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.citation 80 Fordham L. Rev. 573 (2011-2012). en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/1904
dc.description.abstract In Samantar v. Yousuf, the U.S. Supreme Court held that foreign officials sued under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) are not the same as a foreign state and are not entitled to the protection of the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act (FSIA). The Court, however, left open the possibility that the officials might nevertheless be entitled to some form of "immunity under the common law." Now the lower courts, and eventually the Supreme Court, will have to grapple with this yet-to-be-defined defense. This article suggests some considerations that may be of value in creating federal common law immunity for foreign officials in ATS litigation. It concludes by explaining that the defense of foreign official immunity inevitably will involve the weighing and balancing of a number of factors. These factors include input from a defendant officer's government, input from the executive branch, the plaintiff’s nationality, whether the alleged tort took place during military operations, and others.
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Foreign official immunity en_US
dc.subject Alien Tort Statute en_US
dc.subject Sovereign immunity en_US
dc.title Notes on Official Immunity in ATS Litigation en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Notes on Official Immunity.pdf 2.097Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account