The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

Responses to the Ten Questions: 3. Is President Obama's Use of Predator Strikes in Afghanistan and Pakistan Consistent with International Law and International Standards?: Legal Evolution for Targeted Killing by Drone

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Murphy, Richard
dc.date.accessioned 2012-07-23T15:06:26Z
dc.date.available 2012-07-23T15:06:26Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.citation 37 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 5062 (2010-2011). en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/1916
dc.description.abstract This article is a response to a question posed by the Journal of the National Security Forum: Is President Obama’s intense drone campaign against the forces of al Qaeda and the Taliban consistent with international law? Professor Murphy answers this question with a thoughtful explanation of the legal evolution of targeted killings using drones.
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Drones en_US
dc.subject Targeted Killing en_US
dc.subject International Humanitarian Law en_US
dc.subject Central Intelligence Agency en_US
dc.subject President Obama en_US
dc.title Responses to the Ten Questions: 3. Is President Obama's Use of Predator Strikes in Afghanistan and Pakistan Consistent with International Law and International Standards?: Legal Evolution for Targeted Killing by Drone en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Responses to the Ten Questions.pdf 573.3Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account