The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

Rethinking Search and Seizure in a Post-9/11 World

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Loewy, Arnold H.
dc.date.accessioned 2012-07-24T22:10:50Z
dc.date.available 2012-07-24T22:10:50Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.citation 80 Miss. L.J. 1507 (2011). en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/1926
dc.description.abstract In “Rethinking Search and Seizure in a Post-9/11 World”, author Arnold Loewy discusses whether 9/11 has truly had an impact on the way that courts decide Fourth Amendment cases. In a previous article, he argued that 9/11 was largely responsible for a shift in Fourth Amendment case outcomes but now reconsiders these views. Professor Loewy begins by juxtaposing pre-9/11 Fourth Amendment court decisions with post-9/11 Fourth Amendment decisions. He concludes that 9/11 may not have actually played a significant role in the decisions. Professor Loewy also discusses pre- and post-9/11 decisions in the context of airports. He believes that 9/11 has had more impact on these decisions than on decisions relating to situations outside of the airport. Professor Loewy examines the issue of whether consent to be searched is withdrawable and whether once a desire to withdraw is expressed if the person is free to leave with no consequence. He finishes by questioning whether the increased amount of searches and seizures at airports is a step in the right direction or an opportunity for TSA to take advantage of their authority. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Fourth Amendment en_US
dc.subject Search and Seizure en_US
dc.title Rethinking Search and Seizure in a Post-9/11 World en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Rethinking Sear ... re in a Post-911 World.pdf 131.5Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account