DSpace Repository

A Tale of Two Justices (Scalia and Breyer)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Loewy, Arnold H.
dc.date.accessioned 2012-07-24T22:11:09Z
dc.date.available 2012-07-24T22:11:09Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.citation 43 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 1203 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/1927
dc.description.abstract In "A Tale of Two Justices (Scalia and Breyer)", Professor Loewy explores the differences in Justices Scalia and Breyer after their visit to Texas Tech School of Law in November. Loewy explores them on a deeper level, rejecting the usual distinction of conservative versus liberal. Loewy argues that Scalia and Breyer differ on three fundamental issues: what is relevant, the importance of certainty, and the broad or narrow nature of opinions. Loewy praises and criticizes each of the justices for different reasons, but ultimately chooses a hypothetical all-Breyer court over an all-Scalia one, due to Scalia’s lack of recognition of the consequences of Supreme Court opinions. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Texas Tech Law Review
dc.relation.uri http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/text43&collection=journals&index=journals/text1229&id=1229
dc.relation.uri https://advance.lexis.com/api/document/collection/analytical-materials/id/53C2-JPF0-00CT-V0HR-00000-00?context=1000516
dc.relation.uri https://a.next.westlaw.com/Document/I5ebac02cb51611e08b05fdf15589d8e8/View/FullText.html
dc.subject United States Supreme Court en_US
dc.subject Antonin Scalia en_US
dc.subject Stephen Breyer en_US
dc.subject Justices en_US
dc.title A Tale of Two Justices (Scalia and Breyer) en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record