| dc.contributor.author |
Wicker, Jeremy Charles |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2010-03-16T18:38:18Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2010-03-16T18:38:18Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
1973 |
|
| dc.identifier.citation |
1 Fla. St. Univ. L. Rev. 1 (1973) |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10601/199 |
|
| dc.description |
Co-author: James William Moore |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
Professors Wicker and Moore tackle the seemingly age-old problem of gridlock in the courts. They provide the following suggestions: 1) original jurisdiction should implement the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 2) venue and process should support the functioning of the Rules; 3) jurisdictional amount should be eliminated; 4) removal jurisdiction should be reduced to a minimum; and 5) diversity jurisdiction should be retained, but simplified. |
en_US |
| dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
gridlock |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
courts |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Federal Jurisdiction: A Proposal to Simplify the System to Meet the Needs of a Complex Society |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Article |
en_US |