DSpace Repository

Bound By the BAP: The Stare Decisis Effects of BAP Decisions

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Camp, Bryan T.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-01-25T22:46:33Z
dc.date.available 2010-01-25T22:46:33Z
dc.date.issued 1997
dc.identifier.citation 34 San Diego L. Rev. 1643 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/19
dc.description.abstract Final orders, judgments and decrees of a bankruptcy court may not be appealed directly to the circuit Court of appeals but must first go through an intermediate appellate stage. Until recently, the Ninth Circuit was alone in using bankruptcy appellate panels (BAPs) to provide an intermediate level of review between the bankruptcy trial court and the circuit court of appeals. In all other circuits (except briefly in the First Circuit) the route to circuit court review lay through the district court. Now, however, BAPs have expanded into the First, Second, Sixth, Eighth and Tenth Circuits. Controversy attends the BAPs. Specifically, the expansion will likely inflame a long-standing quarrel over the precedential value of BAP decisions. This paper addresses that issue and proposes a solution which addresses the concerns of all sides. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.relation.uri http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/sanlr34&collection=journals&id=1653&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.relation.uri https://advance.lexis.com/api/document/collection/analytical-materials/id/3TXJ-FXT0-00CW-F19R-00000-00?context=1000516
dc.relation.uri https://a.next.westlaw.com/Document/If66b04104a7111db99a18fc28eb0d9ae/View/FullText.html
dc.subject Bankruptcy appellate panel en_US
dc.subject Stare decisis
dc.subject Bankruptcy
dc.subject Marathon Pipeline v. Northern Pipeline
dc.subject Constitutional conflict
dc.title Bound By the BAP: The Stare Decisis Effects of BAP Decisions en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record