DSpace Repository

Getting Something for Nothing: Are Employee Benefits an Entitlement or a Gratuity?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Zanglein, Jayne Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned 2010-03-18T16:29:52Z
dc.date.available 2010-03-18T16:29:52Z
dc.date.issued 1999
dc.identifier.citation 30 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 627 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/214
dc.description.abstract During the 1997-98 term, the Fifth Circuit’s employment law cases focuses on the question of whether employee benefits are an entitlement that vests and not subject to divestment. Cases included fights over benefits such as severances, lifetime medical benefits, and disability payments. The Court also elucidated the proper standard of review for benefit denial cases and addressed issues involving collateral estoppel and inadequate support for summary judgments. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Texas Tech Law Review
dc.relation.uri http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/text30&collection=journals&id=643&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.relation.uri https://advance.lexis.com/api/document/collection/analytical-materials/id/3X6R-PG60-00CT-V09H-00000-00?context=1000516
dc.relation.uri https://a.next.westlaw.com/Document/Ie72f288036f011db8382aef8d8e33c97/View/FullText.html
dc.subject Fifth Circuit en_US
dc.subject Employment law en_US
dc.subject Employee benefits en_US
dc.title Getting Something for Nothing: Are Employee Benefits an Entitlement or a Gratuity? en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record