The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

Ambiguous Independent and Adequate State Ground in Criminal Cases: Federalism along a Mobius Strip

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Baker, Thomas E.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-02-03T16:41:48Z
dc.date.available 2010-02-03T16:41:48Z
dc.date.issued 1985
dc.identifier.citation 19 Ga. L. Rev. 799 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/26
dc.description.abstract Professor Baker discusses the attempts of the United States Supreme Court to determine whether cases have been adequately decided upon independent state grounds. In doing so, Baker critiques the new methodology employed by the Court in Michigan v. Long and the lack of legal justification from which the methodology springs. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Georgia Law Review
dc.relation.uri http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/geolr19&collection=journals&id=809&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.relation.uri https://advance.lexis.com/api/document/collection/analytical-materials/id/3S3V-4CM0-00CW-G3FX-00000-00?context=1000516
dc.relation.uri https://a.next.westlaw.com/Document/Ifbb2def149ba11db99a18fc28eb0d9ae/View/FullText.html
dc.subject Independent state grounds en_US
dc.subject Criminal law
dc.title Ambiguous Independent and Adequate State Ground in Criminal Cases: Federalism along a Mobius Strip en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
baker14.pdf 2.883Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account