The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

Statutes of Limitations Applicable to Private Actions under SEC Rule 10b-5: Complexity in Need of Reform

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bateman, Hal M.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-01T19:00:41Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-01T19:00:41Z
dc.date.issued 1974
dc.identifier.citation 39 Mo. L. Rev. 165 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/310
dc.description.abstract In 1964, the landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in J.I. Case Co. v. Borak authoritatively established the availability of implied civil actions to redress injuries resulting from violations of SEC antifraud rules and became the springboard for an explosion of litigation based on SEC Rule 10b-5. The result has been that the question is no longer whether an implied civil action exists for violations of Rule 10b-5, but rather the definition of the legal requisites for and the available remedies in civil actions under Rule 10b-5 in a kaleidoscopic variety of factual contexts. The great volume of cases has produced considerable confusion and many unresolved issues with respect to the substantive aspects of civil actions under Rule l0b-5. The purpose of this article is to review the development of the law thus far with respect to this problem, to examine the issues presented, and to focus particular attention on the need and the prospects for reform. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.relation.uri http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/molr39&collection=journals&id=175&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.subject SEC Antifraud rules en_US
dc.subject SEC Rule 10b-5 en_US
dc.title Statutes of Limitations Applicable to Private Actions under SEC Rule 10b-5: Complexity in Need of Reform en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
bateman2.pdf 1.002Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account