DSpace Repository

Impropriety of Expert Witness Testimony on the Law

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Baker, Thomas E.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-02-04T20:39:09Z
dc.date.available 2010-02-04T20:39:09Z
dc.date.issued 1992
dc.identifier.citation 40 U. Kan. L. Rev. 325 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/34
dc.description.abstract Professor Baker weighs in on a new trend of allowing expert opinion on the status of the law. He begins with a brief history of lay and expert opinion testimony and continues with an analysis of Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence before concluding that expert opinion on the law simply has no place in federal practice. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher University of Kansas Law Review
dc.relation.uri http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ukalr40&collection=journals&id=345&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.relation.uri https://a.next.westlaw.com/Document/I360a5fc14b0911db99a18fc28eb0d9ae/View/FullText.html
dc.subject Expert opinion en_US
dc.subject evidence en_US
dc.subject Rule 702 en_US
dc.title Impropriety of Expert Witness Testimony on the Law en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record