The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

The Necessity of Counsel in a Prior Conviction When the Prior Conviction is to be Used for Enhancement of Punishment or as an Element of the Offense

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Brakebill, Marwin B.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-02T16:49:51Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-02T16:49:51Z
dc.date.issued 1969
dc.identifier.citation 1 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 129 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/354
dc.description.abstract On March 18, 1963, the United States Supreme Court decided Gideon v. Wainwright, which held that the right to counsel guaranteed by the sixth amendment was applicable to the states by virtue of the fourteenth, making it unconstitutional to try a person for a felony in a state court unless he had counselor had validly waived one. Gideon has since been held to apply retrospectively. On November 13, 1967, the Supreme Court decided Burgett v. Texas, which extended Gideon by holding that a prior felony conviction in which it did not appear that counsel was present or had been waived could not be used in a common law recidivist procedure. This note will explore the outer limits of Burgett. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.relation.uri http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/text1&collection=journals&id=133&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.subject Gideon v. Wainwright en_US
dc.subject Burgett v. Texas en_US
dc.subject 6th amendment en_US
dc.title The Necessity of Counsel in a Prior Conviction When the Prior Conviction is to be Used for Enhancement of Punishment or as an Element of the Offense en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
brakebill1.pdf 625.4Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account