DSpace Repository

Inherent Power to Impose Sanctions: How a Federal Judge Is Like a 800-Pound Gorilla

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Baker, Thomas E.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-02-04T20:41:33Z
dc.date.available 2010-02-04T20:41:33Z
dc.date.issued 1994
dc.identifier.citation 14 Rev. Litig. 195 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/35
dc.description.abstract Debate over sanctions has captured the attention of the legal profession following each Rule 11 amendment. Curiously, there are no Goldilocks who find the Rule "just right"; everyone complains that it is either too strong or too weak. But in a significant sense, all the debate and controversy is beside the point. Suppose that someone said that a federal judge has the power to impose sanctions without the authority of Rule 11 and would have the 'power even if Rule 11 were abolished? Professor Baker seeks to answer this question by plumbing the depths of the inherent power of federal courts to sanction litigants. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Review of Litigation
dc.relation.uri http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/rol14&collection=journals&id=201&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.relation.uri https://advance.lexis.com/api/document/collection/analytical-materials/id/3WHJ-8W80-00CV-9078-00000-00?context=1000516
dc.relation.uri https://a.next.westlaw.com/Document/I91f49b414a4411db99a18fc28eb0d9ae/View/FullText.html
dc.subject Rule 11 amendment en_US
dc.title Inherent Power to Impose Sanctions: How a Federal Judge Is Like a 800-Pound Gorilla en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record