| dc.contributor.author |
Graham, Ann |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2010-04-03T17:57:05Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2010-04-03T17:57:05Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2008 |
|
| dc.identifier.citation |
68 La. L. Rev. 1105 (2008). |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10601/381 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
The purpose of this article is to analyze state case law and statutes to determine the range of state court deference to state agency interpretation of state law. Initially, I hold up the basic Chevron Two Step doctrine as a template for exploring the range of deference given to state agencies. More importantly, since I find that the Roberts Court is not applying Chevron consistently, I argue that states could provide ideas for replacement of the Chevron doctrine at the federal level. The analytical approach in this article is threefold: (1) to examine existing state models for judicial review of state agency interpretations of state statutes; (2) to make recommendations about the most effective approach on a state level; and (3) to identify state concepts, procedures, and standards that could be imported to the federal arena. |
en_US |
| dc.relation.uri |
http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/louilr68&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav&collection=journals&id=1113 |
|
| dc.relation.uri |
http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=68%20La.%20L.%20Rev.%201105 |
|
| dc.relation.uri |
http://web2.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?fn=_top&rs=WLW8.08&rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&mt=Westlaw&vr=2.0&sv=Split&cite=68+La.+L.+Rev.+1105 |
|
| dc.subject |
Chevron doctrine |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
state deference |
en_US |
| dc.title |
Chevron Lite: How Much Deference Should Courts Give to State Agency Interpretation? |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Article |
en_US |