DSpace Repository

Vagueness and Overbreadth in University Regulations

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kirby, Ruth
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-03T21:43:41Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-03T21:43:41Z
dc.date.issued 1971
dc.identifier.citation 2 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 255 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/401
dc.description.abstract The terms vagueness and overbreadth appear frequently in recent student rights cases, and the two ideas they symbolize are fundamentally important in the developing field of campus law. What follows is an examination of vagueness and overbreadth as applied to university rules. In this regard a distinction will, if possible, be made between their meanings, and the two separate bases of constitutional infirmity expressed by the two words will be identified and differentiated. The opinions in recent student rights cases will be examined to see which term the court has utilized in each, and which of the two infirmities furnished the theory for attacking the rule. en_US
dc.publisher Texas Tech Law Review
dc.relation.uri http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/text2&collection=journals&id=265&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.subject Vagueness and overbreadth en_US
dc.subject Student rights en_US
dc.subject Campus law en_US
dc.title Vagueness and Overbreadth in University Regulations en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record