The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

Why the Supreme Court of New York Is Not the Supreme Court of New York

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Camp, Bryan T.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-08T19:39:41Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-08T19:39:41Z
dc.date.issued 2006
dc.identifier.citation 2 Haverford J. 1 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/446
dc.description.abstract This paper explores both the decision to abolish the New York Court for the Correction of Error and Trial of Impeachment (CCE) and the debate on how to reform the Supreme Court which resulted in the decision to still leave it subordinate to a newly created court of last resort, the Court of Appeals. Part II examines the Convention debates and actions regarding the abolition of the CCE and concludes that while many Democrats objected to the CCE on ideological grounds, it was more bi-partisan prosaic reasons that motivated the reformers to kill off the CCE. The critiques from all ideological spectrums boil down to this: the CCE did not and could not provide proper legal guidance to lower courts, litigants, and lawyers. Part III then looks at what problems the reformers faced in replacing the CCE and concludes with a surprise ending regarding the historical meaning of "supreme." That is, while the Supreme Court was not the Supreme Court, it was still supreme. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Haverford Journal
dc.subject New York Supreme Court en_US
dc.title Why the Supreme Court of New York Is Not the Supreme Court of New York en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Camp Haverford 2006.pdf 2.505Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account