| dc.contributor.author |
Casto, William R. |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2010-04-09T16:24:51Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2010-04-09T16:24:51Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
1995 |
|
| dc.identifier.citation |
27 Conn. L. Rev. 329 |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10601/469 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
Professor Casto provides a look at the earlier writings of James Iredell. Especially fascinating is that Iredell developed his ideas in the 1780s without the assistance of pre-existing analyses of judicial review. His ideas accurately foreshadowed virtually all subsequent judicial discussions of the issue in the early Republic. No justice of the Supreme Court -including Chief Justice Marshall - has ever addressed the issue in a more comprehensive and sophisticated fashion. Iredell's explanation and justification also virtually dictated the fundamental rule of judicial interpretation that the early justices used in gauging the constitutionality of legislation. |
en_US |
| dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
| dc.relation.uri |
http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/conlr27&collection=journals&id=339&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav |
|
| dc.relation.uri |
http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=27%20Conn.%20L.%20Rev.%20329 |
|
| dc.relation.uri |
http://web2.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?fn=_top&rs=WLW6.09&rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&mt=LawSchool&vr=2.0&sv=Split&cite=27+Conn.+L.+Rev.+329 |
|
| dc.subject |
James Iredell |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
judicial review |
en_US |
| dc.title |
James Iredell and the American Origins of Judicial Law Review |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Article |
en_US |