DSpace Repository

James Iredell and the American Origins of Judicial Law Review

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Casto, William R.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-09T16:24:51Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-09T16:24:51Z
dc.date.issued 1995
dc.identifier.citation 27 Conn. L. Rev. 329 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/469
dc.description.abstract Professor Casto provides a look at the earlier writings of James Iredell. Especially fascinating is that Iredell developed his ideas in the 1780s without the assistance of pre-existing analyses of judicial review. His ideas accurately foreshadowed virtually all subsequent judicial discussions of the issue in the early Republic. No justice of the Supreme Court -including Chief Justice Marshall - has ever addressed the issue in a more comprehensive and sophisticated fashion. Iredell's explanation and justification also virtually dictated the fundamental rule of judicial interpretation that the early justices used in gauging the constitutionality of legislation. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Connecticut Law Review
dc.relation.uri http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/conlr27&collection=journals&id=339&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.relation.uri https://advance.lexis.com/api/document/collection/analytical-materials/id/3S3T-V9P0-00CV-T0NH-00000-00?context=1000516
dc.relation.uri https://a.next.westlaw.com/Document/I5850602123ef11dbbab99dfb880c57ae/View/FullText.html
dc.subject James Iredell en_US
dc.subject Judicial review en_US
dc.subject Judicial interpretation
dc.subject Constitution
dc.title James Iredell and the American Origins of Judicial Law Review en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record