The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

Civil Procedure

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Floyd, Daisy H.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-14T16:15:05Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-14T16:15:05Z
dc.date.issued 1992
dc.identifier.citation 23 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 141 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/559
dc.description.abstract The Fifth Circuit decided a number of cases during the survey period in which it established new rules or clarified existing law. The decisions discussed in this article represent the court's activity in a myriad of procedural areas. The cases are grouped according to their common themes with special attention given to the more significant decisions. In addition to being affected by Fifth Circuit decisions, the law of the circuit has been affected by the Supreme Court's action in two cases arising out of the Fifth Circuit. In Edmondson v. Leesville Concrete Co., the Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit's en banc decision in which the Fifth Circuit had rejected the civil application of Batson v. Kentucky- to peremptory challenges in criminal actions. The Fifth Circuit fared better, however, in Chambers v. Nasco, Inc., in which the Supreme Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit's decision that a district court has inherent power to impose sanctions upon a party and his attorney for bad faith conduct. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.relation.uri http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/text23&collection=journals&id=159&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.relation.uri http://web2.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?fn=_top&rs=WLW6.09&rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&mt=LawSchool&vr=2.0&sv=Split&cite=23+Tex.+Tech+L.+Rev.+141
dc.subject peremptory challenges en_US
dc.subject sanctions en_US
dc.title Civil Procedure en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
dfloyd2.pdf 1.402Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account