The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

Should the Military Less-Than-Unanimous Verdict of Guilt Be Retained?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Larkin, Murl A.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-16T14:45:38Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-16T14:45:38Z
dc.date.issued 1971
dc.identifier.citation 22 Hastings L. J. 237 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/585
dc.description.abstract Despite praise for the Uniform Code of Military Justice as being more advanced than many thoroughly modern criminal codes, one criticism still remains: except for cases that require a mandatory death sentence, a unanimous guilty verdict is not required. To date, no extensive criticism of the arrangement has been published even though, as Justice Douglas understated it, such an arrangement is “less favorable to defendants.” Here, Professor Larkin takes up the burden of critiquing this arrangement, first providing the history and constitutionality of the decision, its place in due process, arguments for and against the arrangement, and finally arriving at an opinion against it. en_US
dc.publisher Hastings Law Journal
dc.relation.uri http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hastlj22&collection=journals&id=257&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.subject Uniform Code of Military Justice en_US
dc.subject Unanimous guilty verdict en_US
dc.title Should the Military Less-Than-Unanimous Verdict of Guilt Be Retained? en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
larkin3.pdf 1.040Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account