DSpace Repository

Rules of Evidence in Disciplinary Hearings in State-Supported Universities

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Maxwell, Richard W.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-19T15:40:08Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-19T15:40:08Z
dc.date.issued 1970
dc.identifier.citation 1 Tex. Tech L. Rev. 357 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/617
dc.description.abstract In both state and federal courts, the modern trend in case law is away from the rigidity of the exclusionary rules of evidence. The entire field is regarded as anachronistic, and of such awesome complications that the American Law Institute refused to attempt a restatement of it. The reason for the plethora of complicated evidentiary rules is traced by most commentators to a mistrust of the layman juror by the early courts, an attitude no longer regarded as sound. Professor Maxwell covers the collection of exclusionary rules, both constitutional and non-constitutional, and their use in administrative courts. en_US
dc.publisher Texas Tech Law Review
dc.relation.uri http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/text1&collection=journals&id=361&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.subject Exclusionary rules of evidence en_US
dc.title Rules of Evidence in Disciplinary Hearings in State-Supported Universities en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record