DSpace Repository

Lawyer's Duty to the Legal System and to a Client: Drawing the Line

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Newton, W. Frank
dc.date.accessioned 2010-04-21T14:21:04Z
dc.date.available 2010-04-21T14:21:04Z
dc.date.issued 1994
dc.identifier.citation 35 S. Tex. L. Rev. 701 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/636
dc.description.abstract The name "Kaye Scholer" now has the power to evoke strong and diverse responses. Some argue passionately that the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) was quite properly discharging its responsibility to rectify wrongs in the savings and loan industry. Others argue just as passionately that Kaye Scholer lawyers were merely representing clients and acting in the highest tradition of the legal profession. The events of the Kaye Scholer case include not only facts and occurrences, but the interpretation of the meanings and consequences of these facts and occurrences. Both the facts and their meanings have been, and continue to be, extraordinarily controversial. Nonetheless, enough time has passed, and enough has been written, to allow for some perspective to develop. The development of that perspective requires a brief synopsis of the major facts and a review of the primary responses. en_US
dc.publisher South Texas Law Review
dc.relation.uri http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/stexlr35&collection=journals&id=713&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav
dc.relation.uri https://advance.lexis.com/api/document/collection/analytical-materials/id/3S41-1N20-00CV-W0MJ-00000-00?context=1000516
dc.relation.uri https://a.next.westlaw.com/Document/I81f855e14a4b11db99a18fc28eb0d9ae/View/FullText.html
dc.subject Office of Thrift Supervision en_US
dc.subject Savings and loan industry en_US
dc.subject Professionalism en_US
dc.title Lawyer's Duty to the Legal System and to a Client: Drawing the Line en_US
dc.type Article en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record