The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

Judicial Bias, the Insurance Industry and Consumer Protection: An Empirical Analysis of State Supreme Courts' Bad Faith, Breach of Contract, Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and Excess Judgement Decisions, 1990-1991

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Rice, Willy E.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-03-02T20:34:36Z
dc.date.available 2010-03-02T20:34:36Z
dc.date.issued 1992
dc.identifier.citation 41 Cath. U. L. Rev. 325 (1992) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/77
dc.description.abstract While no universal, legal definition of "judicial bias" exists, it may be defined in at least two different ways. First, "judicial bias" may be intentional, which "is a leaning of the mind or an inclination toward one [litigant] over another." The second type of "judicial bias" occurs when immaterial factors such as region of country, type of insurance contract, an insurer's state of incorporation or race of the insured unwittingly determine the outcome of judicial decisions. This Article focuses on the second type of "judicial bias"-disparate-impact discrimination. The Article examines whether state supreme courts are permitting extralegal factors to influence the disposition of suits involving breach of an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, breach of contract, tort of bad faith, and excess liability (excess judgment). An empirical analysis of state supreme court cases decided between 1900-91 was conducted to determine whether "judicial bias" exists. Part I of the Article briefly describes four theories of recovery. Part II surveys various theories of recovery among first-party suits. Part III analyzes third-party suits and discusses various inconsistent bad-faith and excess-liability decisions. Finally, Part IV discusses a disparate-impact analysis. The Article concludes that state supreme courts are unwittingly discriminating against litigants. Specifically, these supreme tribunals allow extralegal factors, which have little to do with the merits of the suits, to influence the disposition of insurance-related cases. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.relation.uri http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/cathu41&men_hide=false&men_tab=citnav&collection=journals&page=325
dc.relation.uri http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=41%20Cath.%20U.%20L.%20Rev.%20325
dc.relation.uri http://web2.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?fn=_top&rs=WLW6.09&rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&mt=LawSchool&vr=2.0&sv=Split&cite=41+Cath.+U.+L.+Rev.+325
dc.subject judicial bias en_US
dc.subject insurance en_US
dc.subject consumer protection en_US
dc.title Judicial Bias, the Insurance Industry and Consumer Protection: An Empirical Analysis of State Supreme Courts' Bad Faith, Breach of Contract, Breach of Covenant of Good Faith and Excess Judgement Decisions, 1990-1991 en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
rice3.pdf 2.368Mb PDF View/Open rice3

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account