| dc.contributor.author |
Van Cleave, Rachel A. |
|
| dc.date.accessioned |
2010-07-07T14:27:22Z |
|
| dc.date.available |
2010-07-07T14:27:22Z |
|
| dc.date.issued |
2000 |
|
| dc.identifier.citation |
1999-2000 Preview U.S. Sup. Ct. Cas. 191 (1999-2000). |
en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/10601/914 |
|
| dc.description.abstract |
Professor Van Cleave previews Garner v. Jones, a Georgia, which raises the issue of whether the retroactive decrease in the frequency of parole reconsideration hearings violate the ex post facto clause of the Constitution? Garner v. Jones is found at 529 U.S. 244. |
|
| dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
| dc.publisher |
Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases |
en_US |
| dc.relation.uri |
http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=4%20Preview%20191 |
|
| dc.relation.uri |
http://web2.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?fn=_top&rs=WLW6.09&rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&mt=LawSchool&vr=2.0&sv=Split&cite=1999-00+Preview+191 |
|
| dc.subject |
Parole reconsideration hearings |
en_US |
| dc.subject |
Ex Post Facto Clause |
en_US |
| dc.title |
When Does a Retroactive Decrease in the Frequency of Parole Reconsideration Hearings Violate the Ex Post Facto Clause? |
en_US |
| dc.type |
Article |
en_US |