The Texas Tech University School of Law Digital Repository

When Does a Retroactive Decrease in the Frequency of Parole Reconsideration Hearings Violate the Ex Post Facto Clause?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van Cleave, Rachel A.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-07-07T14:27:22Z
dc.date.available 2010-07-07T14:27:22Z
dc.date.issued 2000
dc.identifier.citation 1999-2000 Preview U.S. Sup. Ct. Cas. 191 (1999-2000). en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10601/914
dc.description.abstract Professor Van Cleave previews Garner v. Jones, a Georgia, which raises the issue of whether the retroactive decrease in the frequency of parole reconsideration hearings violate the ex post facto clause of the Constitution? Garner v. Jones is found at 529 U.S. 244.
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases en_US
dc.relation.uri http://www.lexis.com/xlink?showcidslinks=on&ORIGINATION_CODE=00142&searchtype=get&search=4%20Preview%20191
dc.relation.uri http://web2.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?fn=_top&rs=WLW6.09&rp=%2ffind%2fdefault.wl&mt=LawSchool&vr=2.0&sv=Split&cite=1999-00+Preview+191
dc.subject Parole reconsideration hearings en_US
dc.subject Ex Post Facto Clause en_US
dc.title When Does a Retroactive Decrease in the Frequency of Parole Reconsideration Hearings Violate the Ex Post Facto Clause? en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
VanCleave_When Does A Retroactive.pdf 428.0Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ScHOLAR

Browse

My Account